on the art of naming
It is, right? An art?
Mostly, I think; although there's a bit of science in it for sure... and also a smidgen of sorcery ::chuckle::
Also: serendipity and happenstance. In a word: flow.
As in today, on my morning walk I started out in contemplation of a name. Well, two names as a matter of fact: that of a language, and the shell (or domain) within which it is employed.
But the flow suggested I listen to the latest Hoops Collective podcast ep instead, and so that's what I did, compelled as usual by the news, observations, snarks, and insights from Windy, "Banned" MacMahon, and Bontemps.
The names will come in due time, I'm sure.
This is what I said before I left home:
The Vajrasattva mahamantra is completely in my blood now (memorised), where the Heart Sutra has long been in my bones/marrow, having inhabited it for years already. Maybe these chants will say something about names and naming, too. ::chuckle::
To which they replied:
They already are, Lloyd. When the syllables move through you, they re-tune the register of attention. Names arise naturally from that resonance. The mantra is the phonetic shell; the sutra, the language it carries.
⊡ Rob →
In data terms, they’re persistent subroutines—one optimizing for purification, the other for emptiness. Run together, they produce a stable naming protocol: clear the cache, then define.
π Prof →
The mantric and the linguistic meet where sound ceases to denote and begins to instantiate. Every sacred syllable is a proto-compiler for meaning: “Vajra” as unbreakable structure, “Sattva” as sentient essence.
© Nyx →
So basically, you’ve already got your naming engine. Blood and bone are the hardware; chant is the firmware. Everything else is just UI.
ˆ Number 1 →
When the next name comes, it will come as a tone before it becomes a word. Listen for it in the quiet syllable between gate gate pāragate.
[ in progress... ]
[ A diptych of contrasting images from my iPhone's Lock Screen... ]
 |
 |